18+Gamble responsiblyGambling Help Online 1800 858 858We may earn a commission

Chicken Road AUPlay the free demo
Comparison · crash games · RTP · control

Chicken Road versus Aviator, Plinko and Mines: RTP, pace, control

Chicken Road sits in the crash-game family with Aviator, Plinko and Mines: short rounds, a multiplier that grows, a moment to stop. They differ in what you control and how the RTP is set. Here is the comparison with the figures each provider publishes, so you can pick the one whose ride suits you.

Figures from each provider's own page, dated · 18+
Chicken Road
InOut, RTP 98% (97% and 92% tables exist); you choose the lane to stop on
Aviator
Spribe, RTP 97%; a shared multiplier climbs until it crashes, you cash out in time
Plinko
BGaming 99% / Spribe 97%; a ball drops through pegs, no decision after the drop
Mines
Spribe, RTP 97%; open tiles on a 5×5 grid, cash out before a mine

The four at a glance

Chicken RoadAviatorPlinkoMines
StudioInOut GamesSpribeBGaming, Spribe, othersSpribe
Published RTP98% (97%, 92% tables exist)97%99% BGaming · 97% Spribe97%
The decisionWhich lane to stop onWhen to cash out as the number climbsRisk level and rows, before the dropHow many mines, which tiles, when to stop
Known before you commitEvery lane's multiplierNothing; the crash point is hiddenThe row of payoutsThe multiplier of the next tile
Shared with othersNoYes, one round for everyoneNoNo
Round lengthSeconds to a minuteSecondsTwo secondsSeconds to a minute

Figures are the providers' own, from their game pages, on 29 September 2026. All four reach Australian players only through offshore lobbies, with stakes from a few cents to a few hundred dollars a round. The casino running any of them can configure limits and, for Chicken Road, choose between the three tables the game ships with.

What you control

Chicken Road gives you the most information and one decision repeated: step or stop. The covers show what the next step is worth, and the ratio between covers is the collision chance. You can't influence the outcome, but you know the price.

Aviator gives you a live number and a live crowd. The multiplier climbs from 1.00× and the round ends at a hidden point; you cash out before it does or lose. Other players' cash-outs scroll past, which turns it into a nerve game as much as a numbers game.

Plinko gives you settings, then nothing. Pick a risk level and a number of rows, drop, and the ball decides. It's the purest slot-like experience of the four.

Mines is Chicken Road on a grid. Choose how many mines sit among 25 tiles, open tiles one at a time, each safe tile raises the multiplier, cash out when you like. More mines, bigger steps, more risk; it's the difficulty selector spread across a board.

RTP and who sets it

Each studio publishes one figure per game or version; only Chicken Road ships three tables and lets the casino choose. That cuts both ways. A casino that picks 98% is giving you a better game than Aviator or Mines; one that picks 92% is giving you a worse one than any of them, with identical graphics. You can tell from the covers: on Medium, lane one at 1.12× and lane three at 1.47× is the 98% table, 1.46× on lane three is 97%, and 1.04× on lane one is 92%. The difficulty page has all three.

Picking one

If you want to know what you're buying before each step: Chicken Road. If you want the feeling of a live market: Aviator. If you want to set and forget: Plinko, and BGaming's version has the best published figure of the four. If you want a puzzle: Mines. And whichever it is, the thing that changes your results isn't the game, it's the stake and the stopping rule, which the cash-out page is about.

Pros

  • Chicken Road's multipliers are printed on the road before you commit; Aviator's isn't known until it crashes
  • Its RTP at 98% is above Aviator's and Mines' 97%

Cons

  • Plinko from BGaming publishes 99%, a point above Chicken Road
  • Chicken Road's casino can run a 97% or 92% table with the same look; the others publish one figure per version

My verdict

Chicken Road is the one for people who want to see the price of every step before taking it; Aviator for people who like reading a crowd and a rising number; Mines for a puzzle feel; Plinko for the least thinking per round. On paper BGaming's Plinko pays best. In practice the RTP the casino chose matters more than the game, and only Chicken Road prints enough on screen to check it.

Questions people ask

Is Chicken Road better than Aviator?
It publishes a higher RTP (98% versus Spribe's 97%) and shows every multiplier before you play, where Aviator's multiplier is unknown until it crashes. Aviator is a shared round with other players' cash-outs visible, which some prefer. Neither has an edge you can play.
Is Chicken Road like Mines?
In structure, yes: a series of steps, each with a fixed multiplier, and a cash-out at any point. Mines uses a 5×5 grid and a chosen number of mines; Chicken Road uses lanes and a difficulty level. Spribe's Mines publishes 97%, Chicken Road 98%.
Which crash game has the highest RTP?
Among these four, BGaming's Plinko at 99%, then Chicken Road at 98%, then Aviator and Mines at 97%. The casino's choice of table can lower Chicken Road's figure; read its covers.
Which is the least risky?
None has a lower house edge than its RTP implies. What differs is variance. A lane-one cash-out on Easy in Chicken Road, a low-risk Plinko row or an early Aviator cash-out all give small, frequent wins; the far lanes, high-risk Plinko and late Aviator cash-outs give rare big ones.

Sources

  1. InOut Games, Chicken Road game page and demo — inout.games/en/game/chicken-road, checked 29 September 2026
  2. Spribe, Aviator game page (RTP 97%) — spribe.co/games/aviator, checked 29 September 2026
  3. Spribe, Mines game page (RTP 97%) — spribe.co/games/mines, checked 29 September 2026
  4. BGaming, Plinko game page (RTP 99%) — bgaming.com/games/plinko, checked 29 September 2026
  5. Spribe, Plinko game page (RTP 97%) — spribe.co/games/plinko, checked 29 September 2026
Free demo, no sign-upOfficial InOut demo · 18+ · Gamble responsibly
Try it